Parkinson’s Law could not have been more accurate regarding time inefficiency and waste. In 1955, Cyril Northcote Parkinson published Parkinson’s Law, which states that work will be extended to the time allotted for completion. This 69 year-old prediction has not been achieved. The concept of utilizing worker time efficiently, yet productively, is not new. We offer that at the core of the challenges faced within our contemporary period is our basic ability to use time effectively and efficiently within the midst of advancement. Moreover, we are in a period of rapid technological advancement, including but not limited to artificial intelligence and robotics. Thus, what might be appropriate for one industry may not be feasible for another industry. Additionally, there are a plethora of industries requiring longer work hours secondary to labor shortages, for example, health care and public safety. workforce constitutes decades of workers who are conditioned to the 40-hour workweek system. challenges to reduce the full-time hourly workweek are not only regulatory, but socio-economic and socio-cultural. For example, an organization may allot 40 hours for a job that an employee may be able to complete in 35 hours, with varying hours and flexibility, while another employee decides to take the full 40 hours to achieve the same output requirements.įor organizations who must comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FSLA) and compensation, the latter notion may be a recipe for losing organizational control and bordering chaos. Rather, you are simply trusted to get your work done, in the time that you allot and in a method that is efficient and effective. You have a number of tasks on your “to do” list, but you are unrestrained by employer and health insurance regulations nor are you restricted by the employer mandates to meet 37.5 to 40 hours or more of clocked time per week. Imagine for a moment that as an employee, you could design and shape your full-time workweek.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |